 |
See all Benchmarks
28 elements available | | From the benchmarks web page:
These benchmarks originate from my research investigating the structure of parity games that are found to be tough to solve for the standard strategy improvement algorithm. All following downloads are distributed under the BSD license.
The generator is written in OCaml. You will therefore need an OCaml compiler to produce an executable. Additionally you can download precompiled binary executables for 32-bit Windows and Linux. Finally there is a pregenerated package of benchmarks that can be obtained as well.
|
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | This is a collection of very tough benchmarks steming from an in-depth analysis of the structure of parity games. If you need larger instances to test your sat solver - please let me know! |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | SAT solvers can be used to attack cryptographic stream ciphers. In this benchmark, the solution of a cnf file recovers the internal state of the stream cipher "Brivium" - a reduced version of the eSTREAM cipher "Trivium". The benchmark contains instances of varying complexity (this is achieved by guessing more or less variable assignments). The benchmark provides 300 instances of each difficulty and each with the SAT and UNSAT case. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 |  | |  | | | | | Date: | 01-Jul-2004 | | Title: | More illustration of IBM CNF benchmark: zChaff vs Berkmin561
| | Hits: | 2735 | | Contributed by: |  |  | |  | | | | | Date: | 23-Mar-2004 | | Title: | An illustration of IBM CNF benchmark: zChaff vs Berkmin561
| | Hits: | 2528 | | Contributed by: |  | | | Recently, we have added more forced satisfiable instances of Model RB. Now there are 8 groups of SAT benchmarks, ranging from 450 variables (relatively easy to solve) to 1534 variables (appearing very hard to solve based on the experimental results of ours and some other researchers). |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | Suites B27 (4 unsatisfiable formulas) and B28 (10 satisfiable formulas) |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | All benchmarks were generated using the method proposed in the paper entitled "Many Hard Examples in Exact Phase Transitions with Application to Generating Hard Satisfiable Instances". There are totally 15 satisfiable CNF instances, all of which are expressed in the DIMACS format. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | a total of 18 unsattisfiable and 30 satisfiable CNF formulas |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | A total of 43 unsatisfiable and 20 satisfiable CNF formulas (Suites B16-B21). |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | 32 CNF formulas from formal verification of DLX processors with multicycle functional units, exceptions, branch prediction, and instruction queues |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | 10 CNF instances. Formula engine_6_nd.cnf is the most chalenging one. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 |  | |  | | | | | Date: | 10-Aug-2003 | | Title: | New benchmarks from formal verificationof microprocessors
| | Hits: | 2118 | | Contributed by: |  | | | All the benchmarks used for the 2003 QBF evaluation have been added to QBFLIB,
categorized according to their hardness with respect to the solvers that
participated in the evaluation. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
|  | |
 |  | |  | | | | | Date: | 17-Feb-2003 | | Title: | The IBM Formal Verification Benchmark
| | Hits: | 2293 | | Contributed by: |  | | | These SAT benchmarks are significantly more challenging compared to their counterparts from formal verification of safety, generated before. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | From the authors web site:
The benchmarks presented here are the results of a satisfiability-based formulation for the board-level multi-terminal net routing problem in the digital design of Clos-Folded FPGA based logic emulation systems. We transform the FPGA board-level routing task into conjunctive normal form (CNF) such that the formula is satisfiable if and only if the problem is routable.
|
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 |  | |  | | | | | Date: | 04-May-2002 | | Title: | SAT2002 competition first stage results available
| | Hits: | 2771 | | Contributed by: | Daniel Le Berre | | Keywords: | Deduction Rules, BMC, DPLL, Intelligent Backtracking, Local Search, Random 3SAT, EDA, Benchmark, SAT application, Equivalency Reasoning, Randomised Algorithms, Learning |
| | | |  |  | |
|  | |
 | | | The two biggest benchmarks are 327 MB when uncompressed with 'gunzip', and have close to 900,000 CNF variables and 15 million clauses.
If you use this benchmark suite, please reference the following paper:
M.N. Velev, and R.E. Bryant, "Effective Use of Boolean Satisfiability
Procedures in the Formal Verification of Superscalar and
VLIW Microprocessors," 38th Design Automation Conference (DAC '01),
June 2001, pp. 226-231. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | If you use this benchmark suite, please reference the following paper:
M.N. Velev, "Using Rewriting Rules and Positive Equality to Formally Verify
Wide-Issue Out-Of-Order Microprocessors with a Reorder Buffer,"
Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE '02), March 2002, pp. 28-35. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
 | | | If you use this benchmark suite, please reference the following paper:
M.N. Velev, "Using Rewriting Rules and Positive Equality to
Formally Verify Wide-Issue Out-Of-Order Microprocessors with a
Reorder Buffer," Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE '02),
March 2002, pp. 28-35. |
| |  | |  |
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |